论文部分内容阅读
两大特点于曙光第一,是评委班子新老结合,相对“年轻化”;第二是各类稿件比较均衡且有新的提高。 “四次书代会”后,学术委员会的构成发生很大的变化,这次的评委会根据事业发展的需要,注意了专业化和年轻化,所组成的评委会是新老各半,五十岁以下的评委占三分之一。学术工作有其自身的特点,需要专业化和更多的阅历,目前的结构说年轻化可能不明显,但是相对年轻化是做到了。这次的评委中多是近年来活跃在书坛上的有成就的或在“首届中国书法兰亭奖·理论奖”中折桂的,这种新鲜血液的补充是事业发展的需要,也是评选工作的需要,这在评选工作中确实显
The two major features in the dawn of the first, is the combination of old and new judges team, relative to “young”; second is all kinds of manuscripts more balanced and a new increase. After the Fourth Book Conference, the composition of the academic committee has undergone tremendous changes. According to the needs of career development, the jury has paid attention to the specialization and rejuvenation. The jury composed by the two parties is old and new , Judges under the age of 50 accounted for one third. Academic work has its own characteristics, requires specialization and more experience, the current structure that younger may not be obvious, but relatively young is done. The judges are mostly active in the book in recent years, the achievements of the or in the “First Chinese Calligraphy Lanting Award · Theoretical Award” in the off, this new blood supply is the need for career development, but also The selection of work needs, which is indeed in the selection process was significant