论文部分内容阅读
系统把握空专名的意义机制应立足于有关指称对象存在问题与指称行为本身问题的区分与关联。基于“假装”概念的分析,可准确把握意向性在空专名指称过程中的作用机理。只有在空专名本体论上坚持一种广义的实在论,才可为虚构对象提供适当的居所。关于指称行为的意向性分析有助于把握和充分发挥指称作为一种“行动”的实质与功能,进而把握“意向对象”的形成机理。以明确指称过程的实质为指针,可以明确:内涵和外延是思想层面的范畴,含义和指称是语言层面的范畴,概念的内涵表达为名称的含义,概念的外延表达为名称的指称对象;只要搞清楚这些层面区分并把握其中的关联,便可去除笼罩在空专名身上的神秘光环,并把握描述论和因果论之争的实质。
The system grasps the meaning and mechanism of empty proper names should be based on the distinction and connection between the existence of the alleged object and the question of the alleged act itself. Based on the analysis of the concept of “pretending ”, we can accurately grasp the mechanism of intention in the process of empty nominal name. Only in the generic idiosyncratic ontology adhere to a generalized realism, fictional object can provide an appropriate residence. Intentional analysis of the alleged act helps to grasp and give full play to the substance and function of the allegation as an “action”, and then grasp the formation mechanism of the “intention object”. To clarify the substance of the allegation process as a guideline, we can make it clear that connotation and extension are categories on the ideological level, meaning and allegation are linguistic-level categories, connotations of concepts are expressed as the meanings of names, and epitaxial expressions of concepts as alluding objects of names; To understand these levels of differentiation and to grasp the relationship between them, you can remove the mysterious aura enveloped in the empty name, and grasp the essence of the debate between descriptive and causal theory.