虽然“官场”时有无良败类,不过“理直气壮地做官”仍不失为一句豪言。问题是,什么样的“理”才算“直”。有文章说,“孔繁森当了那么多年的地级干部,按理说他的生活应该过得比一般老百姓好得多……”该文作者歌颂孔繁森,值得称道,但这“按理说”的“理”,就很难说是“直”的。“生活过得比一般老百姓好得多”,或许是一些“官”的实际境遇,但绝不能贯以“应该”作 Although “bureaucratic” when there are unscrupulous class, but “upright to be an official” is still a rhetoric. The question is, what kind of “reason” is considered “straight”. An article said: “Kong Fansen was a cadre of prefectural level for so many years. Logically speaking, his life should have fared much better than the ordinary people ...” The author extolled Kong Fansen commendable, but this “truth” theory It is hard to say “straight”. “Living a lot better than the average citizen” may be some “official” actual situation, but must not be consistent with “should” be