论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较等离子剜除联合电切术(PKEP-PKRP)与传统电切术(TURP)治疗前列腺增生的疗效。方法:收集2013年7月~2015年7月行PKEP-PKRP术和TURP术治疗132例BPH患者资料,比较两组术前、术后一般情况、术后最大尿流率(Q_(max))、剩余尿量(PVR)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、尿道狭窄及尿失禁等指标。结果:两组患者术前一般情况各项指标间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后膀胱冲洗时间、留置导尿管时间、膀胱痉挛持续时间及住院时间相比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间术后PVR、Q_(max)、IPSS、尿道狭窄及尿失禁等指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:PKEP-PKRP与TURP疗效相比较,前者具有并发症少、术后恢复快等优势,是目前治疗前列腺安全、有效,较为理想的方法,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the efficacy of plasma etanercept excision (PKEP-PKRP) and traditional electrotomy (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: The data of 132 patients with BPH treated with PKEP-PKRP and TURP from July 2013 to July 2015 were collected. The preoperative and postoperative general conditions, postoperative maximal urinary flow rate (Q max) , Residual urine output (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urethral stricture and urinary incontinence. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the preoperative general conditions (P> 0.05). The postoperative urinary bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time, duration of bladder spasm and hospital stay were significantly different (P <0.05). The postoperative PVR, Q max, IPSS, urethral stricture and urinary incontinence had significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with TURP, PKEP-PKRP has the advantages of less complications and faster recovery after operation. It is safe, effective and ideal for the treatment of prostate. It is worth promoting.