从历史情况看,创造性破坏对经济增长是净贡献者,因为创新提高了效率和生产率。而这些充斥市场的O2O创新在本质上有着反通胀的特征,甚至趋于通缩。那么,未来新的就业机会一定出现在那些智能机器、自动化无法覆盖的领域。但最终谁会从中受益呢? Historically, creative destruction has been a net contributor to economic growth as innovation has increased efficiency and productivity. And these O2O innovations flooding the market are inherently anti-inflation features and even deflation. Then, new jobs in the future must appear in areas that are not covered by smart machines and automation. But in the end who will benefit from it?