论文部分内容阅读
若非监控录像证实司机清白,江苏南通险些又发生一起“彭宇案”。一天后,湖北武汉的电动车主做好事扶起自己摔倒的老太,也险被诬为肇事者。从南京的彭宇案到天津的许云鹤案,司法判决对世道人心的影响,似乎正越来越明显。我们都相信法官没有受到邪门歪道的影响,但其一审判决却都令公众失望以至愤怒。尽管我们收获了某种欣慰——舆情反映人心,这失望与愤怒至少证明,人心多向善——但是,求仁不得,难免令人沮丧!法官为何不能作出一个励善黜恶的完美判决?
If non-surveillance video confirmed the innocent drivers, Jiangsu Nantong almost happened together “Peng Yu case ”. One day later, the electric car owner in Wuhan, Hubei Province, did a good job of propping up her old lady who fell and was also accused of being the culprit. From the Peng Yu case in Nanjing to the Xu Yunhe case in Tianjin, the impact of judicial decisions on the world’s people seems to be getting more and more obvious. We all believe that judges have not been affected by scary misconduct, but their first instance verdicts have caused the public to disappoint and even anger. Although we have been rewarded with a sense of public opinion that reflects the aspirations of the people, this disappointment and anger at least prove that the people are more conscientious. However, it is inevitable that they will not be able to win their favor and will be frustrating! Why can not the judge make the perfect verdict?