论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨临床路径在产褥感染护理中的应用效果。方法：以我院于2015年1月—2016年1月间在社会上收治的40例产褥感染患者为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组各20例。给予观察组患者临床护理路径，给予对照组患者常规护理，对比两种护理方法的临床效果。结果：观察组患者的住院时间、住院费用、护理满意度均优于对照组，两组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：对产褥感染患者实施临床护理路径，效果显著，值得推广和应用。“,”Objective:To investigate the effect of the application of clinical pathway in puerperal infection nursing. Method:In our hospital in January 2015-January 2016 among 40 cases of puerperal infection treated patients for the study were randomly divided into observation group and the control group of 20 cases. Given clinical nursing path in patients in the observation group, the control group were given routine care, nursing clinical effect comparison of the two methods. Results:The patient’s hospital stay, hospital costs, satisfaction with care than the control group, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). Conclusion:puerperal infection for patients with clinical nursing path, the effect is signiifcant, worthy of promotion and application.