论文部分内容阅读
关于“传统”与“现代”的地位问题的争论渐见平缓下来,人们好象感到与其花时间互相去吵,不如抓时间各自动手来干。经过沉静的反思,人们便会发现自己所持“非此即彼,非彼即此”的宏辞,正面临一种看起来十分模糊的概念的冲击,一种没有结论的“结论”的挑战。这就是我们常说的“可能性”。可能是量的关系,可能是质的关系;可能是时间的关系,可能是空间的关系;……宇宙之巨,世界之大,可能性之多! 冷静地说,我们应该给各种可能性以最大的宽容和理解。当然,对可能性的宽容并不会防碍人们在具体情况下的具体决策,只是给决策的完善和改进提供了无尽的机会,并为决策者保持良好的创造性和智力状态确定了必要的认识论的基础。
The controversies over the status of “traditional” and “modern” are gradually easing. People seem to feel that instead of spending time on quarrels with each other, it is better to grasp the time and work their own ways. After some quiet reflection, people will find that their rhetoric of “non-impersonality or non-imperativeness” is facing the challenge of a concept seemingly ambiguous and a conclusion of no conclusion. This is what we often say “possibilities.” May be the relationship between quantity, may be a qualitative relationship; may be the relationship of time may be the relationship between space; ... the giant universe, the world’s big, many possibilities! Calmly, we should give a variety of possibilities With the greatest tolerance and understanding. Of course, tolerance of possibility does not hinder people’s concrete decision-making in specific situations, but provides endless opportunities for perfection and improvement of decision making and establishes the necessary epistemology for policy makers to maintain their good creativity and mental status Foundation.