论文部分内容阅读
导言疑古辨伪风气自古有之。迄自清末以来,乃不乏其例。从李文田之疑《兰亭》系伪托,到康有为《新学伪经考》《孔子改制考》,其后逐渐浸淫擎蔓至章回小说、书画名迹等范畴。一九三七年朱家济对怀素《自叙》首致疑窦,适亦流风余绪使然。建国后,此风有增无减,大翻公案反成时尚,乃以《兰亭》《自叙》称最。然皆袭讹承舛,变本加厉而已。简述之,一九六五年,郭沫若凭南京出土之王谢墓志,重申李文田旧说,
Introduction Doubtless ancient customs of the ancient style of it. Since the end of the Qing Dynasty, there are many examples. From Li Wentian’s suspicion of “Lanting” Department of pseudo-care, to Kang Youwei “new school pseudo-Confucianism test” “Confucius restructuring test”, and then gradually immersed engine crankshaft to Zhang Hui novels, calligraphy and painting and other areas. In 1937, Zhu Jiji made the most of his suspicions on the “self-narration” of Huai Su. After the founding of the PRC, this trend of unabated growth, turning the corner into fashion, is “Lanting” “self-described” the most. However, all false positives, intensified it. In short, in 1965, Guo Moruo, with the epitaph of the king unearthed in Nanjing, reiterated Li Wentian’s old remark,