论文部分内容阅读
对于刑事案件法官释法权,比较研究英美法系与大陆法系的不同法律传统,有助于为我国法官释法权的运用寻找思路;我国法律解释权采取二元化的体制,存在不合理性。司法机关作为法律适用主体,将法律解释权归其所有更具优势。法官作为解释法律的实际主体,强调法官释法权具有合理性。要使法官释法权具有类推适用的效力,最简便有效的方法便是引入判例制度;刑事案件法官在解释法律时应当坚持罪刑法定原则,才能避免徇私枉法。
The comparative study of the different legal traditions of Anglo-American legal systems and civil law systems in criminal cases can help us to find a way of thinking for the application of the powers of interpretations of judges in our country. The dual system of legal interpretation in our country is irrational Sex. As the subject of law application, the judiciary has all the advantages of legal interpretation. Judges, as the actual subjects that explain the law, emphasize the reasonableness of judges’ The most convenient and effective way to make the judge’s power of legal analogy applicable is to introduce the system of case law. When interpreting the law, the criminal judge should insist on the principle of legally prescribed punishment, so as to avoid being self-serving or misleading.