论文部分内容阅读
对法律确定性的寻求是美国法研究的主题之一。本文以对法律的不确定性为线索,梳理出法律现实主义运动和批判法学运动产生和发展的思想背景和社会环境,这两次运动分别挑战和颠覆了一度占支配地位的法律科学和进步主义法学,提供了解决法律不确定性的不同思路。这两次激进的理论运动并未实现提供确定性的初衷,但是分别点出了法律发展的时空背景和法律运作的社会环境的重要性。这两场运动的成果为法律确定性的寻求提供新的理论基础和对话平台,为社会现象和法律技术之间建立了中介和联系。社会现象和法律规范之间的互动需要通过法律议论完成。
The search for legal certainty is one of the main themes of American law. Based on the uncertainty of law, this essay combs the ideological background and social environment of legal realism and criticism of the emergence and development of jurist movement, which challenge and subvert the once dominated legal science and progressiveism Law, provides a different way to solve the legal uncertainty. These two radical theoretical movements did not realize the original intention of providing certainty, but separately pointed out the spatiotemporal background of legal development and the importance of the social environment in which law operates. The achievements of these two campaigns provide a new theoretical basis and platform for the search for legal certainty and establish an intermediary and linkages between social phenomena and legal technologies. The interaction between social phenomena and legal norms needs to be done through legal arguments.