论文部分内容阅读
本文介绍了三种击实标准对两种土料的比较试验结果后指出:不同击实标准即使击实功能相当,也未必是等效的。正在拟定的我国国家击实标准当取当量普氏标准时,应合理选择击实筒的尺寸。南实处标准尽管有较高的击实功能,但它的击实筒也远较其他击实标准高,这相当于增加了击实土样的超高,从而抵消了较高击实功能的效果。
This article describes the results of the comparison test of three kinds of compaction standards for two kinds of soil materials and points out that different compaction standards may not be equivalent even if the compaction function is equivalent. The national compaction standard that is being worked out should adopt the size of the compaction cylinder when taking the equivalent Platts standard. Although the Nanshi Standard has a high compaction function, its compaction cylinder is also far higher than other compaction standards, which is equivalent to an increase in the ultra-high compaction of soil samples, thereby offsetting the effect of a higher compaction function. .