引章关于中国政府在“尖阁归属问题”中所持的立场,日本媒体的主流说法是“原本对‘尖阁诸岛’的领有权并不关心的中国一方,在20世纪70年代有人提出那里可能存在着大规模的天然气田后,突然提出了对‘尖阁诸岛’的领有权主张”。照此来看,中方的这种主张是基于资源民族主义的,是别有用心而非“纯粹”的。然而’日本对于领有权的主张就真的不是别有用心,就真那么“纯粹”吗? Preamble As for the Chinese government’s position in the “Senate ownership issue”, the mainstream version of the Japanese media is that “the Chinese side, which originally did not care about the sovereignty of the Senkaku Islands, After the advent of the suggestion that there could be a large-scale natural gas field there, a sudden claim of sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands was raised. From this point of view, this Chinese proposal is based on resource nationalism with ulterior motives rather than ”pure". However, ’Japan really has no ulterior motives for claiming sovereignty, and is it really’ pure ’?