论文部分内容阅读
目的观察优质护理干预联合慢性咽炎合剂治疗慢性咽炎的临床疗效。方法选择2014年4月至2015年6月80例符合入组标准的慢性单纯性咽炎患者作为研究对象,按收治顺序将患者随机分为观察组40例和对照组40例。两组患者均给予慢性咽炎合剂治疗,对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组给予优质护理干预,两组均干预2周。干预前后进行焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评定,记录症状(咽痒咽干、咽部异物感、咽部疼痛充血、咽部黏膜干燥)改善时间,评价两组临床疗效,治疗结束后采用自行设计的护理满意度问卷调查表入户进行满意度调查。结果观察组和对照组干预2周后SAS评分分别为(37.72±8.86)分和(44.53±8.72)分,SDS评分分别为(40.62±8.55)分和(46.25±9.04)分,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);对照组和观察组咽痒咽干、咽部异物感、咽部疼痛充血、咽部黏膜干燥改善时间,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组的临床总有效率为95.00%(38/40),对照组为87.50%(35/40),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.041,P<0.05)。观察组护理满意率为97.50%(39/40),对照组为70.00%(28/40),差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.498,P<0.05)。结论优质护理干预有助于提高慢性咽炎合剂治疗慢性咽炎的临床疗效,加快临床症状缓解时间,提高护理满意度。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of quality nursing intervention combined with chronic pharyngitis mixture in the treatment of chronic pharyngitis. Methods From April 2014 to June 2015, 80 patients with chronic simple pharyngitis who met the criteria of inclusion were selected as study subjects. Patients were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases) according to the order of treatment. Two groups of patients were given chronic pharyngitis mixture treatment, the control group given routine nursing intervention, the observation group were given quality nursing intervention, two groups were intervention for 2 weeks. Before and after intervention, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were assessed, symptoms were recorded (symptoms of pharyngitis and pharynx, pharyngeal foreign body sensation, hyperemia of pharynx and pharyngeal mucosa) Group clinical efficacy, after the end of treatment using self-designed questionnaire for satisfaction with nursing satisfaction satisfaction survey. Results The SAS scores of the observation group and the control group were (37.72 ± 8.86) and (44.53 ± 8.72), respectively, and the SDS scores were (40.62 ± 8.55) and (46.25 ± 9.04) (All P <0.05). The control group and the observation group had pharyngitis and throat, throat foreign body sensation, pharyngeal hyperemia and pharyngeal mucosa, and the difference was statistically significant (all P <0.05). The total clinical effective rate was 95.00% (38/40) in the observation group and 87.50% (35/40) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 7.041, P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction rate was 97.50% (39/40) in the observation group and 70.00% (28/40) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 13.498, P <0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing intervention can improve the clinical curative effect of chronic pharyngitis mixture in treating chronic pharyngitis, accelerate the time of clinical symptom relief and improve nursing satisfaction.