论文部分内容阅读
本格在《对于辩证法的批判》一文中,对辩证法提出了诘难,认为唯物主义哲学要精确化,就必须同模糊的、不普遍的辩证法划清界限。本格对于辩证法的批判涉及的问题很广,而他围绕“辩证的对立”的错误认识和对于“矛盾是事物发展的动力”的极力否认是其错误批判的集中体现。当他把这样的错误理解推广到整个辩证法中时,就不可避免地走到辩证法的对立面,甚至根本无法将唯物主义的立场贯彻到底。其实,他对辩证法思想的具体批判,都与他误解辩证法的实质和精髓相关。
In his article “Criticism of Dialectics,” Benghu put forward some difficulties in dialectics. He believed that if materialist philosophy is to be precise, it must be clearly defined with ambiguous and non-universal dialectics. His criticism of dialectics involves a wide range of issues. His devotion to “dialectical opposition” and his denial of “contradiction is the driving force for the development of things” are the concentrated expressions of his erroneous criticism. When he extends such misunderstandings to the whole dialectics, he inevitably goes to the opposite of dialectics and can not even carry out the materialist position to the end. In fact, his specific critique of dialectical thinking is related to his misunderstanding of the essence and essence of dialectics.