长期以来，史学界对国民党正面战场持久战略的研究一直存在两种不同的观点：（１）以片面抗战统括其抗战方针，不作具体深入分析；（２）认为早在战前，国民党当局就已制订持久消耗战的战略方针。这两种观点均缺乏深入细致的研究，有失偏颇。笔者认为，考察其持久战略的形成，应首先看其对内对外政策何时根本转变；其次看其对中日两国国情的了解程度，为解决什么进行持久战，何以持久致胜等问题 For a long time, historians have always had two different views on the long-term strategy of the Kuomintang frontal battlefield: (1) unilateral and anti-Japanese war unifies its anti-Japanese policy and does not make a detailed and in-depth analysis; (2) that as early as before the war, the Kuomintang authorities A strategic strategy of protracted war of attrition has been formulated. Both of these views lack of thorough and detailed research and are biased. In my opinion, when examining the formation of its long-term strategy, we should first look at the fundamental changes in its domestic and foreign policies. Secondly, we should look at the extent of understanding of the national conditions of China and Japan, and the long-term warfare and lasting success in resolving the issue