论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查法官工作倦怠现状。方法:于2005-11采用整群抽样法随机抽取400名河南省安阳地区法官进行问卷调查,所有调查对象均知情同意。调查被试的一般情况,并采用中式工作倦怠量表进行工作倦怠程度评估,量表包括3个因素,分别为情绪耗竭、人格解体、成就感降低,每个因素满分均为35分,总分越高,说明倦怠程度越严重。以情绪耗竭分数>25、人格解体分数>11、成就感降低分数>16为标准,将在工作倦怠的3个因素中,任何1个因素得分高于临界值的被试界定为轻度倦怠者,在2个因素上得分高于临界值的被试界定为中度倦怠者,将在3个因素上得分高于临界值的被试界定为高度倦怠者。以法院为单位匿名施测。结果:收回内容详实问卷247份,有效率为61.8%。①247名调查对象中男162人,女85人;已婚224人,未婚23人;20￣30岁48人,31￣40岁114人,41￣50岁68人,50岁以上的17人;文化程度:大专及以下42人,本科192人,研究生13人。②法官情绪耗竭、人格解体、成就感降低的检出率分别为21.9%,50.2%及40.1%;法官轻度、中度、高度工作倦怠的检出率分别为34.4%,29.1%及6.4%。③在年龄、性别、受教育程度和婚姻状况上,法官的工作倦怠只在年龄上差异有显著性意义(P<0.05￣0.01)。31￣40岁法官的情绪耗竭得分显著高于20￣30岁和50岁以上者(F=1.886,P<0.05);人格解体层面上,50岁以上的法官显著高于50岁以下的法官(F=2.487,P<0.05);成就感降低层面上,20￣40岁的法官显著高于40岁以上的法官(F=3.827,P<0.01)。结论:法官的工作倦怠程度较高,应对年长法官的情绪耗竭和人格解体方面,年轻法官的成就感降低方面进行重点干预。
Objective: To investigate the status quo of judge job burnout. Methods: In 2005-11, 400 random samples of judges in Anyang area of Henan Province were randomly selected by cluster sampling method, and all respondents were informed of their consent. To investigate the general situation of the subjects and evaluate the degree of job burnout by using the Chinese Job Burnout Scale. The scale includes three factors: emotional exhaustion, disintegration of personality and decrease of accomplishment, with a score of 35 for each factor. The total score Higher, indicating the more serious burnout. Among the three factors of job burnout, the scores of emotional exhaustion score> 25, personality disintegration score> 11 and sense of achievement reduction score> 16 were defined as those who score higher than the critical value , Those who scored higher than the threshold on two factors were defined as moderate burnout, and those who scored higher than the threshold on three factors were defined as highly burnout. Anonymous court testing. Results: 247 copies of detailed questionnaires were retrieved with an effective rate of 61.8%. ①247 subjects were 162 males and 85 females; married 224, unmarried 23; 20 to 30 years old 48, 31 to 40 years old 114, 41 to 50 years old 68, over the age of 17; Education: college and below 42 people, undergraduate 192 people, 13 graduate students. (2) The detection rates of judges ’exhaustion, personality breakdown and sense of accomplishment were 21.9%, 50.2% and 40.1% respectively; the detection rates of judges’ mild, moderate and high degree of burnout were 34.4%, 29.1% and 6.4% . (3) There was significant difference in the job burnout of the judges only in terms of age, gender, educational attainment and marital status (P <0.05 ~ 0.01). Judges from 31 to 40 years old had significantly higher scores on emotional exhaustion than those over the age of 20-30 and over 50 (F = 1.886, P <0.05). On the level of personality disintegration, judges over 50 were significantly higher than those under 50 F = 2.487, P <0.05). At the lower sense of accomplishment, the judges aged 20-40 were significantly higher than those over 40 (F = 3.827, P <0.01). Conclusion: Judges have a high degree of job burnout, and should focus on intervention of older judges in terms of emotional exhaustion and disintegration of personality and reduction of young judges’ sense of accomplishment.