论文部分内容阅读
醉驾一律入罪与否,关系到刑法谦抑原则能否得到贯彻、刑法的人权保障和法益保护机能能否实现平衡、宽严相济的刑事司法政策能否得到落实,具有重要的理论和实践意义。当下司法实践对醉驾案件采取一律入罪的做法是值得商榷的,应当明确醉驾不应当一律入罪,并且对醉驾的司法认定应当围绕其犯罪构成要件展开。在主观要件中,该罪的主观方面应当是故意且主要是间接故意,必须证明驾驶人对醉驾行为导致危险结果的主观认知和放任心态;在客观要件中,不能仅以血液酒精含量为醉驾入罪的绝对标准,必须以此为基础,综合考察客观情节判断醉驾行为的危险性。
It is of great theoretical and practical significance to know whether drunken driving is criminalized or not, and whether the principle of modesty of criminal law can be implemented. Whether the criminal law’s human rights protection and the legal protection function can achieve the balance and whether the criminal justice policy of combining leniency with strict discipline can be implemented. The current judicial practice of drunk driving cases to all criminal practice is questionable, it should be clearly drunk driving should not be all into the crime, and drunk driving of the judicial determination should focus on the elements of its crime to start. In the subjective elements, the subjective aspect of the crime should be intentional and mainly indirect. It is necessary to prove the driver’s subjective cognition and laissez-faire attitude toward the dangerous result of drunk driving. In the objective elements, we can not just drunk a driver with blood alcohol content The absolute standard of incriminating must be based on this, a comprehensive study of objective circumstances to determine the risk of drunk driving behavior.