论文部分内容阅读
如果要考察该完全法条中所规定的法律后果是否可以得以实现,必须根据该法条规定为假设条件所涉的法律事实的存在与否来决定。这就牵涉到对完全法条中假设条件所涉的事实情况是否存在加以证明的问题。众多的案件事实并不能真伪分明地得以确认。常常会出现这样的情况,即作为争讼基础的事件不可能在每一个细节上均能得到澄清,对于法官的裁决具有重要意义的事实,既不能被查明已经发生,也不能被查明没有发生。法官在案件事实真伪不明时,因对事实主张的真实性的怀疑,所生之不利后果裁决由一方当事人承担,此为证明责任所要解决的问题。
Whether or not the legal consequences stipulated in the complete law can be fulfilled must be determined in accordance with the provisions of the law for the existence or not of the legal facts involved in the hypothetical conditions. This involves the question of the existence of the facts in the hypothetical conditions of a complete law. Numerous facts of the case can not be confirmed authenticity. It is often the case that an event based on a contentious issue can not be clarified in every detail, and that a fact of great importance to a judge’s decision can neither be ascertained nor has it been ascertained occur. When the truth of the case is not known, the judge, due to his doubts about the authenticity of the factual claim, is responsible for the adverse consequences of the ruling by one of the parties. This is a question to be borne by the burden of proof.