论文部分内容阅读
既往关于近代中国法理史的研究,从主题内容上多侧重“法理”语汇和教义学层面,从研究范式上多倚重于线性史观和类型化的叙事模式,隐匿和忽视了传统政教观念在法政思想嬗变中的结构性意义。以观念演替的内在视角重塑晚清法政变革史,我们会发现在“器物→制度→文化”更替的表象之下蛰伏的是以“华夷之辨”为基础性思维的传统政教观念的强势支配。这种强势体现在变革与保守的双方都要援引传统的政教观念论证自身政治主张的正当性,即以“信古”的方式所表现的“历史记忆”对法政制度的支配性意义。由此,在逢迎西式知识与衔接古学传统之间,近代中国法理呈现出繁复的观念谱系。
Past studies on the history of legal history in modern China focus more on the lexical and pedagogical aspects of the “jurisprudence” from the perspective of the subject matter, and rely more on the narrative mode of linear history and genre from the research paradigm, hiding and neglecting the traditional concepts of the state and religion The Structural Significance of the Evolution of Legal Thought. From the internal perspective of conceptual succession to reshaping the history of law and politics reform in the late Qing dynasty, we find that dormant under the appearance of the replacement of “Utensil → System → Culture” is based on “Hua Yi Zhi Dian” as the basic thinking The strong domination of the traditional conception of religion and state. This strength is reflected in the fact that both the reformist and the conservative sides should invoke the traditional concepts of state and religion to demonstrate the legitimacy of their own political opinions, that is, the “historical memory” of the “ancient memory” of the dictatorship of the legal system significance. As a result, modern Chinese jurisprudence presents a complex lineage of ideas between the western tradition and the ancient tradition.