论文部分内容阅读
殷海光的道德调整论,主张对儒家伦理持辩证分析,批判礼教的宗法专制主义,阐扬儒家的仁道理想。他关于道德原理恒定、具体德目变化的观点,超越了“除旧布新”的进化论观点,揭示了道德演进之常变交织的辩证过程。殷海光不赞同儒学与民主势不两立的“五四”命题,认为传统道德的伟大遗产可以和现代性并存不悖。他的整合儒家仁义、基督博爱、佛教慈悲与民主、科学的道德重建方案,超越了“五四”“现代/传统”二元对立范式,而熔中西古今于一炉。此一“穆小姐”(道德)和“德先生”(民主)、“赛先生”(科学)的结合,填补了“五四”时期新文化运动的道德真空。
Yin Haiguang’s moral adjustment theory advocates a dialectical analysis of Confucian ethics and criticizes the patriarchal despotism of ethics and ritual education and expounds Confucian ideal of benevolence. His point of view on the constant change of ethical principles and specific moral changes transcends the evolutionary view of “removing old ones” and reveals the dialectical process of constantly evolving moral evolution. Yin Haiguang does not agree with the “May 4th” proposition that Confucianism and democracy are irresistible. He believes that the great legacy of traditional morality can coexist with modernity. His integration program of Confucian benevolence, fraternity of love, compassion and democracy in Buddhism, and moral reconstruction of science goes beyond the paradoxical paradox of “May 4th Movement” and “Modernity / Tradition”, while melting West China is now in a furnace. The combination of “Miss Mu” (moral) and “Mr. De” (democracy) and “Mr. Sai” (science) filled the moral vacuum of the “New Culture Movement” during the May 4th Movement.