论文部分内容阅读
目的 了解医院工作人员感染SARS病毒的危险性。方法 对与SARS患者收治相关的工作人员进行问卷调查 ;用酶联免疫法检测SARS冠状病毒IgG抗体。结果 发放调查问卷 4 5 0份 ,收回问卷并采集血标本 4 4 1人份。接受调查者全部按照防护规定进行个人防护。 5例为SARS抗体IgG阳性 ,均为直接接触SARS病人和 (或 )与SARS病人标本或衣物直接接触者 ,比例为 5 / 2 6 0 ;非直接接触SARS病人和(或 )与SARS病人标本或衣物非直接接触者 ,比例为 0 / 1 81 ,二者无统计学差异。 5例SARS病毒IgG抗体阳性者分别来自SARS病房、CCU病区 (该病区曾发生过临床疑似SARS病人 )、儿科病房和门诊、标本转送中心及洗衣班 ,均不符合SARS的临床可能或疑似定义。结论 医院目前的防护系统是完善的
Objective To understand the risk of SARS in hospital staff. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted on the staffs involved in the treatment of patients with SARS. The SARS coronavirus IgG antibody was detected by ELISA. Results A total of 405 questionnaires were sent out, questionnaires were withdrawn and 4 4 1 blood samples were collected. The respondents all conducted personal protection according to the protection regulations. 5 cases were positive for SARS antibody IgG, all of whom were in direct contact with SARS patients and / or were in direct contact with SARS patients’ specimens or clothing in a proportion of 5/260; non-direct contact with patients with SARS and / or SARS patients or Clothing non-direct contact, the ratio was 0/1 81, the two were not statistically different. Five cases of positive SARS virus IgG antibodies were from SARS ward, CCU ward (where clinically suspected SARS patients had occurred), pediatric wards and outpatient departments, specimen transfer centers and laundry classes, all of which were not clinically relevant or suspected to be SARS definition. Conclusion The hospital’s current protection system is perfect