论文部分内容阅读
在人类社会的历史发展长河之中,先后产生过三种基本的证据模式,从而形成三种证据制度。在不同的证据模式下,法官的认证过程有着规制和自由两种对立特质。但是,不论选择何种模式,法官认证均是以法律为量器的利益衡量过程。对此观点,通过证明模式的纵向历史沿革考察、横向特征差异考察、宏观的利益考量和微观的利益考量等研究方式将能得到圆满论证。这一观点的论证价值也体现于我国民事认证模式的定位与选择之中。
Among the long history of human society, there have been three basic patterns of evidence that have led to the formation of three systems of evidence. In different modes of evidence, the judge’s certification process has two opposite qualities of regulation and freedom. However, regardless of the model chosen, judges’ certification is a measurement of the benefits of the law. From this point of view, we can successfully conclude the research on the longitudinal historical evolution of the model, the investigation of the differences in horizontal characteristics, the consideration of macro interest and the consideration of micro interest. The argument value of this view is also reflected in the positioning and choice of China’s civil certification model.