论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较洛美沙星用序贯疗法和输液疗法的临床疗效。方法:下呼吸道感染患者76例,洛美沙星序贯疗法组39 例和输液疗法组37例,疗程6 d。结果:洛美沙星序贯疗法和输液疗法的临床疗效和细菌清除率基本相同。结论:序贯疗法 疗效确切,治疗费用较传统的输液疗法低。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of lomefloxacin with sequential therapy and infusion therapy. Methods: 76 cases of patients with lower respiratory tract infection, lomefloxacin sequential therapy group 39 cases and infusion therapy group 37 cases, the treatment of 6 d. Results: Lomefloxacin sequential therapy and infusion therapy clinical efficacy and bacterial clearance rate is basically the same. Conclusion: Sequential therapy is effective and the treatment cost is lower than traditional infusion therapy.