论文部分内容阅读
不同于大陆法系将之归入健康权保护模式和英美法系直接将其作为一种单独诉因的做法,我国惊吓损害情形中第三人精神损害赔偿的请求权基础可以依据死者近亲属精神损害赔偿请求权之规定,类推适用《精神损害赔偿解释》第2条,或是依据《侵权责任法》第22条纳入一般人格权予以保护,而第三人遭受的惊吓损害后果可作为侵权行为的加重后果,在当前市场经济条件下,是提高精神损害赔偿金额的重要影响因素。
Contrary to the fact that the civil law system classifies it as the right to health protection and the Anglo-American legal system as a sole cause of action, the basis of the right of claim for the third party’s mental damage in China can be based on the spirit of the close relatives of the deceased The right to claim damages, analogous to article 2 of the Interpretation of Mental Injury Compensation, or the protection of the general right to personality pursuant to article 22 of the Tort Liability Act, while the third party may suffer as a result of the damage inflicted on the person The aggravating consequence is an important factor for raising the amount of compensation for mental damages under the current market economy.