论文部分内容阅读
中华民国1929年票据法被公认为是一部具有很强前瞻性和可行性的成功立法。其成功主要有三个原因:一是北洋政府时期起草了五部票据法草案,并进行了深入的讨论,这为1929年票据法打下了良好的基础。二是南京政府在起草票据法的时候,吸收了较多专家学者参加立法,避免了“内行起草,外行审稿”而出现的失误。另外,南京政府工商部提交的草案比较完善。三是当时的民间团体(主要是上海银行公会)积极推动票据法立法,为立法活动提供了重要的舆论和智力支持。相比之下,1995年票据立法由于指导思想上的偏差和立法机关的失误,出现了许多重大的原则问题,给审判工作带来了很大的困扰和混乱。当前正在进行的民法典立法工作应该吸取这些历史的经验和教训。
The ROC 1929 bill is widely recognized as a successful legislation that has strong foresight and feasibility. Its success has three main reasons: First, the Beiyang government drafted during the draft five bills and conducted in-depth discussions, which for the 1929 bill method laid a good foundation. Second, when the Nanjing government drafted the Notes Law, it absorbed more experts and scholars to participate in the legislation and avoided mistakes made by the “drafting of the experts in the industry and reviewing the draft by the foreign experts”. In addition, the draft submitted by the Nanjing Government Department of Commerce is relatively complete. Third, the then non-government organizations (mainly the Bank of Shanghai Association) actively promoted the bill law legislation and provided important media and intellectual support for legislative activities. In contrast, in 1995, the bills legislation caused many major issues of principle due to the deviation of guiding ideology and the mistakes made by the legislature, which brought great distortions and confusion to the adjudication work. The current ongoing civil code legislation should draw on these historical experiences and lessons.