编辑同志:我村村民李富与村民委员会签订了一份承包本村鱼塘的承包合同。合同规定,承包人李富每年向发包方也就是村委会缴纳承包费8000元,其他费用由承包方负担,如不按时上缴承包费,发包方村委会有权随时终止合同李富承包后,精心经营,效益不错。但他想既省力又挣钱,便以每年5万元的承包费用又转给住在本村的一外地人,李富每年坐收42000元。由于该外地人苦钻养鱼技术,悉心管理,仍然取得了较好的收益。这时李富又向其提出了增加承包费的要求。被发包方村委会发觉后告到法院。法院通过审理:认为该转包合同无效,仍应维持原承包合同的效力,遂判被告人李富转包渔利的部分,收归集体所有,请问这判决合理吗?读者张义 Editorial comrades: Li Fu, a villager in my village, signed a contract with the villagers’ committee to contract the Yuantang village. Contract stipulates that the contractor Li Fu to the Employer or the village committee each year to pay 8,000 yuan contract fee, the other costs borne by the contractor, if not turned over to the contract costs, the Employer’s Village Committee has the right to terminate the contract at any time after the contract of Li Fu , Well-managed, good performance. However, he wanted to save energy and make money. He then handed over an alien who lived in this village for an annual contracting fee of 50,000 yuan. Li Fu received 42,000 yuan a year. Due to the drilled fish farming technique and careful management of the outsiders, good returns have still been obtained. At this time, Li Fu made a request to increase the contracting fee again. After being found out by the village committee found the court. Court passed: that the subcontract is invalid, should still maintain the effectiveness of the original contract, then sentenced the defendant Li Fu subcontracted fishing profit part of the collective ownership, may I ask the ruling is reasonable?