论文部分内容阅读
地震重灾区之一的四川省平武县南坝镇重建依赖于国家政府的规划和指导,原本的乡镇在重建后呈现出明显的都市特征,然而政府构想中的都市化效应与地方的实际表达产生了差别,“政府的都市化”不等同于“人的都市化”。地方群众面对“灾变”后既熟悉又陌生的家乡产生了诸多的不适应。重建后的数年间,当地人在逐渐适应“政府都市化”的同时也积极发挥自身的能动性形塑着“人的都市化”。南坝镇经历“灾变”后的都市化表现,当地人对灾后重建的适应和改造,表明了人的能动性在从“政府的都市化”到“人的都市化”的变迁过程中所起到的实际作用。
The reconstruction of Nanba Town, Pingwu County, one of the hardest-hit areas in the earthquake, depended on the planning and guidance of the national government. The original townships showed obvious urban features after reconstruction. However, the urbanization effect in the government’s conception and the actual expression of local governments The difference is that “the urbanization of the government” is not the same as the “urbanization of the people.” Local people face a lot of incompatibility in their hometown, familiar and unfamiliar after the “disaster”. In the few years after the reconstruction, the locals, while gradually adapting themselves to the “government urbanization,” also actively displayed their own initiative to shape the “urbanization of people.” The urbanization of Nanba after the “catastrophe” and the adaptation and reconstruction of locals to post-disaster reconstruction show that people’s initiative is changing from the “urbanization” of government to the “urbanization of people”. The actual role played in the process of change.