论文部分内容阅读
关于四通,人们有太多的关注,也有太多的疑问——曾经是中国民营高科技企业一面旗帜的四通,是如何在中国经济快速跃进的90年代被拉下的?四通前度时期的沉寂和2001年的再度风光到底为什么?本刊本期特地推出名为“四通化石?”的长篇专题报道,希望能就近观察一下四通为什么。需要指出的是,本文虽名为“四通化石?”,但更大意义上是从四通的历史意义和符号意义上着眼的,恰恰“四通”的英文名字又是“Stone”,所以才有此一联想,但愿不致引起大家的误会!在本文成文过程中采访过一些当事人,也参考了大量的资料,遗憾的是在约见采访四通的时候并不顺利,在四通内部人士的推荐下,我们和原四通集团企划宣传部部长左方女士进行了接触,但因种种原因采访未能如期进行,在此深表遗憾。由于掌握材料和采访的不充分,本文内容和观点偏颇之处,敬请读者指正!
There are too many concerns and too many doubts about Sitong - how the Sitong, once a banner of China’s private high-tech enterprises, was pulled down in the 1990s when China’s economy was rapidly leapfrogging? Period of silence and the re-scenery in 2001 in the end Why? This issue of this issue specifically entitled “Stone Fossil?” Long feature reports, hoping to observe the Stone nearby why. What needs to be pointed out is that although the article is titled “Forth Four Fossils?”, In the larger sense, it is from the historical significance and the symbolic meaning of Stone. It is precisely “Stone” that the English name is “Stone.” Therefore, Only this association, I hope it will not cause everyone’s misunderstanding! In the process of writing this article interviewed a number of parties, but also with reference to a large amount of information, unfortunately, in an interview with the Stone is not smooth when the insiders We deeply regretted that we had contact with Ms. Zuo Fang, former Minister of Planning and Propaganda Department of Stone Group, but the interview failed to be conducted on schedule for various reasons. Due to inadequate grasp of materials and interviews, this article content and views biased, please correct me readers!