Rensch’s rule proposes a universal allometric scaling phenomenon across species where sexual size dimorphism (SSD) has evolved:in taxa with male-biased dimorphism,degree of SSD should increase with overall body size,and in taxa with female-biased dimorphism,degree of SSD should decrease with increasing average body size.Rensch’s rule appears to hold widely across taxa where SSD is male-biased,but not consistently when SSD is female-biased.Furthermore,studies addressing this question within species are rare,so it remains unclear whether this rule applies at the intraspecific level.We assess body size and SSD within Tribolium castaneum (Herbst),a species where females are larger than males,using 21 populations derived from separate locations across the world,and maintained in isolated laboratory culture for at least 20 years.Body size,and hence SSD patts,are highly susceptible to variations in temperature,diet quality and other environmental factors.Crucially,here we nullify interference of such confounds as all populations were maintained under identical conditions (similar densities,standard diet and exposed to identical temperature,relative humidity and photoperiod).We measured thirty beetles of each sex for all populations,and found body size variation across populations,and (as expected) female-biased SSD in all populations.We test whether Rensch’s rule holds for our populations,but find isometry,i.e.no allometry for SSD.Our results thus show that Rensch’s rule does not hold across populations within this species.Our intraspecific test matches previous interspecific studies showing that Rensch’s rule fails in species with female-biased SSD.