发表在1980年第二期《南艺学报》上关于《阿炳事考一二及其它》的文章,有值得商榷之处。现谈一点个人浅见,供研究工作者参考。文章开端就提出了关于阿炳的生平事略,认为某些问题的传写失去真实,或者以讹传讹……。文中援引的属于否定“议出道门”的资料,其中大部分不仅是在阿炳逝世长达29年 Published in 1980, the second issue of “Nanyi Journal” on the “Bing Bing two or other” article, it is debatable. Now a bit personal humble opinion, for the reference of researchers. At the beginning of the article, he proposed his life story about Bing. He thought that the writing of some issues was untrue or the facts were incorrectly asserted. The article quoted as belonging to the negative “proposing a door” information, most of which is not only in the death of Arthur up to 29 years