论文部分内容阅读
目的:对常规静脉应用抗生素治疗后小儿肺炎恢复期痰鸣音较多或难吸收的小儿肺炎患者,通过观察疗效探讨其治疗的最佳时间。方法:将360例患儿随机分为A、B、C 3组,每组60例。全部患儿入组后均静脉用抗生素治疗,A组在静脉用抗生素治疗恢复期痰鸣音较多,继续应用抗生素的情况下,加用肺部超短波理疗3天;B组入组后在静脉应用抗生素治疗的情况下,即加用肺部超短波理疗3天;C组只静脉应用抗生素治疗,不加用肺部超短波理疗。观察各组疗效。结果:早期肺部超短波理疗B组与C组比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05);恢复期肺部超短波理疗A组与B组比较、A组与C组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肺部超短波理疗对小儿肺炎恢复期痰鸣音较多或难吸收的小儿肺炎患者有临床疗效,以用抗生素治疗后痰鸣音较多或难吸收的,加用肺部超短波理疗3天疗效最佳,临床上有实用价值。
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the best time for treatment of pediatric pneumonia in children with recurrent phlebitis of pneumonia after conventional intravenous antibiotic therapy. Methods: 360 children were randomly divided into A, B and C groups, 60 cases in each group. All children were treated with intravenous antibiotics, A group in the recovery of intravenous antibiotics treatment of phlegm more, continue to use antibiotics, plus pulmonary ultra-short wave therapy for 3 days; B group into the group in the vein Application of antibiotic treatment, that is, plus the use of pulmonary ultra-short wave therapy for 3 days; C group only intravenous antibiotics, without the use of pulmonary ultrashort wave therapy. Observed the effect of each group. Results: There was no significant difference between group B and group C in early pulmonary ultrashort wave therapy (P> 0.05); group A and group C were significantly different between group A and group C (P <0.05). Conclusion: Pulmonary ultrashort wave therapy in children with pneumonia recovery phlegm or difficult to absorb more children with clinical efficacy of pneumonia, with antibiotic treatment of phlegm more or difficult to absorb, plus pulmonary ultra-short wave therapy for 3 days The best effect, clinical practical value.