论文部分内容阅读
记者:中苏论战是20世纪五六十年代国际共运中的一个重大事件,对中苏关系及世界格局均产生了深刻影响。自20世纪90年代以来,随着有关档案的解密,关于中苏论战的专题研究颇受关注,并出现了一些有价值的成果。我们注意到,在这方面既有一些亲历者的珍贵回忆,也有一些学者的学术专著和论文,总体看学界的共识是在逐渐增多的。然而在对“九评”的认识和评价上,分歧仍然很大。您认为究竟应当如何正确看待中苏论战和“九评”?
Reporter: The Sino-Soviet polemic was a major event in the international communist movement of the 1950s and 1960s and had a profound impact on the Sino-Soviet relations and the world pattern. Since the 1990s, with the declassification of archives, thematic studies on the Sino-Soviet polemics have drawn much attention and some valuable results have emerged. We have noticed that in this respect there are not only precious memories of those witnesses, but also academic monographs and dissertations of some scholars. Generally speaking, the consensus of the academic circles is gradually increasing. However, on the understanding and evaluation of the “Nine Commentaries”, the differences are still huge. How do you think that we should correctly view the Sino-Soviet polemic and the “Nine Commentaries”?