论文部分内容阅读
罗斯基教授的中国GDP增长率“正负2.2区间说”,经西方媒体轮番炒作,犹如一石激起千层浪。但许多研究中国统计问题的中外学者,如任若恩、香港理工大学副教授伍晓鹰、中科院、清华大学国情研究中心胡鞍钢教授以及麦迪森、布鲁金斯研究所高级研究员尼古拉斯·拉迪等,均表示不能接受被他们称之为“轻率”的这一结论。经济合作与发展组织经济学家安格斯·麦迪森认为,中国国民经济的核算质量总体上在改善。他不认为1998年以后会突然出现巨大的统计“水分”,经济增长率大幅度下降。不过,这些学者也承认,中国经济增长率的统计的确存有问题,在计算水平、方法与范围等方面有待进一步改进提高。
Professor Roski’s China’s GDP growth rate of “plus or minus 2.2 interval,” said the rotation by the Western media speculation, like a stone aroused Melaleuca waves. However, many Chinese and foreign scholars who study China’s statistics issues, such as Ren Ruoen, Wu Xiaoying, an associate professor at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Professor Hu Angang from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Research Center of Tsinghua University, and Nicholas Radi, senior researcher of the Brookings Institution, Accept what they call “reckless” this conclusion. Angus Madison, an economist at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, believes that the quality of accounting in China’s national economy as a whole is improving. He does not think that there will suddenly be a huge statistical “water” after 1998, and the economic growth rate will drop sharply. However, these scholars also acknowledge that there are indeed problems with the statistics on the economic growth rate in China, and they still need further improvement and improvement in terms of calculation level, methods and scope.