论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究血常规联合C-反应蛋白(CRP)检验在区分小儿细菌感染与小儿病毒感染中的价值。方法:选取近两年在我院接受治疗的感染性疾病患儿118例,根据临床诊断,将病毒感染分为对照组,细菌感染分为试验组,每组59例,对其进行血常规检验以及CRP检验,再对试验组患儿分别进行血常规、CRP检验、血常规联合CRP检验,观察并比较两组患儿的白细胞计数(WBC)、CRP浓度及试验组患儿的阳性检出率。结果:试验组的WBC(16.36±3.98)×109/L、CRP浓度(39.43±10.06)mg/L明显高于对照组的WBC(5.41±1.61)×109/L、CRP浓度(4.79±1.46)mg/L;血常规联合CRP检验的阳性率(93.22%)明显高于血常规检验的阳性率(62.71%)、CRP检验的阳性率(66.10%),其有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:血常规联合CRP检验在区分小儿细菌感染与小儿病毒感染中,对小儿的细菌、病毒感染能够做出明确判断,值得临床应用推广。
Objective: To investigate the value of blood routine combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) test in distinguishing between pediatric bacterial infection and pediatric viral infection. Methods: A total of 118 children with infectious diseases were treated in our hospital in recent two years. According to clinical diagnosis, virus infection was divided into control group, bacterial infection was divided into experimental group, 59 cases in each group, And CRP test, and then the blood test, CRP test, blood test and CRP test were performed on the children in the test group. The WBC and CRP levels in the two groups were compared and the positive rate of CRP in the test group . Results: The WBC (16.36 ± 3.98) × 109 / L and the CRP concentration (39.43 ± 10.06) mg / L in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (5.41 ± 1.61) × 109 / L and 4.79 ± 1.46 mg / L. The positive rate of blood combined with CRP test (93.22%) was significantly higher than that of blood test (62.71%) and CRP test (66.10%), which was significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: The blood routine combined with CRP test can make a clear judgment on the bacterial and viral infection in children in differentiating pediatric bacterial infections and pediatric viral infections, which is worthy of clinical application.