当前,反全球化声音日益高涨,且主要来自曾经主导全球化的美英等国家。美英等国家何以遭到全球化的反噬?本文认为,美国主导的新自由主义全球化从国际分工、国际贸易和收入分配三个方面加剧了世界经济的不平衡,而且这种不平衡不再仅仅对发展中国家不利,对发达国家的负面影响也不容忽视,这导致发达国家的政治和社会风险日益凸显。在这一背景下,全球化进入深度调整和转型阶段:西方统治精英的全球主义共识大大削弱,市场逻辑与国家逻辑进入重新博弈阶段,全球经济治理呈现进一步碎片化趋势。与此相对应,东亚地区由于一方面对全球化仍有着强烈的内在需求,另一方面因其在传统全球化中积累的成功经验,再加上地区大国中国的责任担当,或有可能引领一种更加包容 At present, the voices of anti-globalization are on the rise and mainly come from countries such as the United States and Britain that once dominated globalization. Why the United States and Britain are opposed by globalization? This paper argues that the globalization of neo-liberalism led by the United States has exacerbated the imbalance in the world economy from the three aspects of international division of labor, international trade and income distribution, and this imbalance is no longer merely mere The negative impact on developing countries and the developed countries should not be overlooked. This has led to the growing political and social risks in developed countries. Against this background, globalization has entered a period of deep readjustment and transformation: the globalist consensus of Western elites has been greatly weakened, market logic and state logic have entered a re-game stage, and global economic governance has become more fragmented. Correspondingly, East Asia, because of its strong intrinsic demand for globalization on the one hand, and its successful experience in traditional globalization, on the other, together with its responsibility as a regional power, may lead one More inclusive