论文部分内容阅读
从学术史的视角研究苏诗为历代读者所接纳的历程就必须关注这样的问题 :历代苏诗的评价与研究有无规律可循 ?如果有 ,它遵循怎样的规律运行 ?又有哪些因素在制约、支配它的发展 ?历代苏诗研究者提出了哪些问题 ?其地位、影响如何 ?他们探讨的焦点问题有哪些 ?在争论中体现了什么样的观念与风气 ?能给我们进一步研究以什么样的启示 ?本文选取苏诗历史接受的分期与特点 ,苏诗注释中分类注本与编年注本的得失与衍进 ,苏诗选录与评点中所彰显的主题形态与艺术风格 ,历代文艺论争中苏诗评价的分歧与融通等几个典型问题进行探讨 ,以期揭示苏诗历史接受的规律与机制。
From the perspective of academic history, it is necessary to pay attention to the question that the study of the history of the Soviet Union’s poetry is accepted by the readers of different ages: whether the evaluation and research of the ancient poems in each period followed the law? If yes, what kind of law does it follow? What factors What problems do they have in their history? What are the key issues they discuss? What kind of ideas and ethos are reflected in the debate? Can we further study what In this paper, the author chooses the stages and characteristics of the history of the acceptance of the Soviet Union poetry, the pros and cons of the classification and annotations in the notes on the poetry of the Soviet Union, the themes and artistic styles, Disagreement and compatibility of Sino-Soviet poetry evaluation, and so on, with a view to reveal the laws and mechanisms accepted by the history of the Soviet Union.