论文部分内容阅读
門福录(中国科学院工程力学研究所) 原文把土骨架当作伏埃特体建立了三向固结方程,对一定的土类在某些場合下确有一定的实用意义。但笔者认为原文中尙有局限和不足之处,特提出讨论。 (一)原文虽正确地指出了不能把土一成不变地视为麦克斯维尔体,但所述的土壤适于用伏埃特体代表的理由也是不够充分的。因为这里讨论的固结问题,孔隙水的影响已另在固结方程中考虑到了,饱水土壤的变形性征不能和土骨架本身者混为一谈。当然由于目前在实验上还很难做到使两者分开,以
Menfulu (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) originally established a three-dimensional consolidation equation for the soil skeleton as a Voltbody, which does have certain practical significance for certain soil types under certain circumstances. However, the author believes that there are limitations and deficiencies in the original text. (1) Although the original text correctly pointed out that soil cannot be regarded as Maxwellian body, the reason why the soil is suitable to be represented by a Volta body is not sufficient. Because of the consolidation problem discussed here, the effect of pore water has been taken into account in the consolidation equation, and the deformability of saturated soil cannot be confused with the soil skeleton itself. Of course, due to the fact that it is still difficult to separate the two at present,