论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过ICU患者经外周动静脉采血后两种按压止血方法效果的对比,找到更有效的,能提高患者和护理人员满意度的方法。方法:将ICU患者按入院时间分成对照组和实验组,对照组使用传统按压方法,实验组使用改良后的按压方法,观察外周动、静脉采血后穿刺部位发生瘀斑、血肿的情况。结果:传统按压法瘀斑、血肿发生率为21.1%,采用改良后的按压止血方法瘀斑、血肿发生率为8.2%,两者相比具有显著差异,(P<0.05)。结论:改良后的按压止血方法较传统方法更有效,同时减轻了患者的痛苦,减少了护理人员的工作量,提高了双方满意度。
OBJECTIVE: To find out more effective ways to improve the satisfaction of patients and nursing staff by comparing the effects of two kinds of compression hemostasis after peripheral blood and venous blood sampling in ICU patients. Methods: The ICU patients were divided into control group and experimental group according to the time of admission. The control group was treated by traditional compression method. In the experimental group, the improved compression method was used to observe the situation of ecchymosis and hematoma at the puncture site after peripheral arterial and venous blood sampling. Results: The incidence of ecchymosis and hematoma was 21.1% in the traditional method. The incidence of ecchymosis and hematoma was 8.2% with the improved method of compression hemostasis. There was a significant difference between the two (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The improved method of pressing hemostasis is more effective than the traditional method, alleviating the suffering of patients, reducing the workload of nurses and increasing the satisfaction of both parties.