论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对康德的感性直观论与胡塞尔的范畴直观论的比较分析，证明胡塞尔企图突破康德的感性直观论的界限而创造出所谓的知性直观，是不成功的。然而胡塞尔的努力也揭示出康德的感性直观的局限性，即康德的知识论只注意知识的可能性而忽视了对知识的多样性的原因的分析。这样，胡塞尔对哲学的发展仍然具有极大的推动作用。在此基础上，本文进一步提出不同于胡塞尔的新的范畴直观论，把范畴直观定义为“带有个性色彩的感性直观”，并对这一新的范畴直观的形成机制、表现形式、作用和意义作了初步的阐述。
By comparing and analyzing Kant ’s perceptual intuitionism and Husserl’ s theory of category intuition and proving that Husserl tried to break through Kant ’s perceptual intuitionism to create the so - called intellectual intuition, it is unsuccessful. However, Husserl’s efforts also reveal Kant’s perceptual intuitionistic limitation that Kant’s epistemology only pays attention to the possibility of knowledge and ignores the analysis of the causes of the diversity of knowledge. In this way, Husserl still has a great impetus to the development of philosophy. On this basis, the paper further proposes a new category of intuitionism that is different from Husserl, defines category intuition as “sensual intuition with individuality and color”, and makes a direct reference to the formation mechanism, manifestation, The role and significance of a preliminary elaboration.