在报刊、电视等媒体中常看到这样一种理论:出卖国有小型企业,收回一个等价,只是把实物形态的国有资产转变为价值形态的国有资产,不存在国有资产流失问题,也不是私有化。这当作一种创新之说,为国有小型企业的出卖似乎找到了一个非私有化的理论根据,颇为传媒所欣赏。说出卖国有小型企业收回一个等价,不存在国有资产流失问题,当然是对的。但说这种出卖只是国有资产的形态变化,不是私有化,就悖理了。他们是明知故讳,有意隐去私有化 In newspapers, television and other media, it is common to see such a theory as selling a small state-owned enterprise and recovering an equivalent, but transforming the physical state-owned assets into state-owned assets of a value form without any loss of state assets or privatization . As an innovation, it seems that the betrayal of small state-owned enterprises has found a theoretical basis for non-privatization, which is quite appreciated by the media. Of course it is correct to say that selling small state-owned enterprises should recover an equivalent price without any loss of state-owned assets. But this kind of betrayal is only a morphological change in the state-owned assets. It is not privatization, which is contrary to the principle. They know the taboo, intend to hide the privatization