论文部分内容阅读
俄罗斯汉学家M·E·克拉芙佐娃指出,关于《楚辞》著作权这种争议的背后,潜藏着比讨论这篇或那篇独立篇目的创作历史更严肃的问题。具体来说,便是这部南方(楚地)的诗歌,是否是单独一个天才的产物,或者说突出如屈原者。未来研究中最可行的,是将屈原视为楚国诗人的综合形象,但这并不意味着否定他在这一方面的历史真实性。《楚辞》研究的中心问题首先应该是南方诗歌传统在中国文学艺术发展过程中的地位和角色定位。单独研究中国古代的诗歌遗产无法解决提出的问题,我们不得不对中国古代精神和生活的其他方面进行研究。
Russian scholar M.E. Cravzova points out that behind the controversy over the copyright of the Songs of Chu lies a problem that is more serious than the discussion of the history of the creation of this or that article. Specifically, this is the poem of the south (Chu region), whether it is a product of a single genius, or outstanding as Qu Yuan. The most feasible thing in future research is to regard Qu Yuan as the comprehensive image of the Chu national poet, but this does not mean to deny his historical authenticity in this respect. The central issue in the study of Chu Ci should, at first, be the position and role of the Southern poetry tradition in the development of Chinese literature and art. Studying alone the legacy of ancient Chinese poetry can not solve the problems raised, we have to study the ancient Chinese spirit and other aspects of life.