论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨社区精神障碍诊断与公共安全风险评估软件对听幻觉的检测效果。方法对80例住院的重型精神障碍患者，应用社区精神障碍诊断与公共安全风险评估软件检测听幻觉，并与医生人工检查结果进行对比分析。结果本组患者计算机软件检测听幻觉检出率为81．25％，医生人工检出率为76．25％，两者比较差异无显著性（χ2＝0．60，P ＞0．05）。本组精神分裂症患者中计算机软件检测听幻觉检出率为78．85％，心境障碍患者为29．41％，均以贬义评论性听幻觉最为突出。结论社区精神障碍诊断与公共安全风险评估软件对重型精神障碍患者的听幻觉检测结果与专科医生人工检查结果相近，可以作为社区和家庭辅助检查工具。“,”Objective Objective To explore the detection result of the Diagnosis and Public Safety Risk Assessment Software for Community Mental Disorders (DPSRASCMD ) in auditory hallucination . Methods Auditory hallucinations were detected with the DPSRASCMD in 80 hospitalized patients with severe mental illness and compared with doctor’s artificial examination results .Results The detection rate of auditory hallucination was 81 .25% with the DPSRASCMD and 76 .25% by doctors’ inspections ,which showed no significant differ‐ence (χ2 = 0 .60 ,P>0 .05) . The detection rate of auditory hallucination with the DPSRASCMD was 78 .85% in schizophrenics and 29 .41% in patients with mood disorders ,derogatory and arguing auditory hallucinations were the most outstanding .Conclusion The detection results of auditory hallucination with the DPSRASCMD in patients with severe illness are close to the results of doctors ’ artificial examinations and the DPSRASCMD could serve as community and family auxiliary examination tool .