约翰.斯坦贝克的故事就是在以快速为特征的“进步”车轮下演绎的。象征19世纪末20世纪初美国工业化速率的“进步”车轮碾过之后,留下的是“两个民族”无尽的痛。《愤怒的葡萄》诊断出了“两个民族”的病因,解释了政治经济学所无法解释的现实,在这一点上胜过了当时的政治经济学。丰收一幕是商品异化现象的缩影:客体不仅嘲笑了主体,而且还伤害了主体。这种异化现象是“进步”的车轮飞速运转的必然结果。 The story of John Steinbeck is deduced from the wheel of rapid characterization. After the wheels of “improvement”, symbolizing the rate of industrialization in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, were run through, the endless pain of “two peoples” was left behind. Angry Grape diagnosed the etiology of “two nations,” explaining the unexplainable reality of political economy and outshining the political economy of that time. Harvest scene is the epitome of commodity alienation: the object not only laughed at the main body, but also hurt the main body. This alienation is the inevitable result of the rapid progress of “progressive” wheels.