论文部分内容阅读
目的通过开展干预前后对无偿献血相关知晓率的调查,研究干预措施的效果,从而更好地普及无偿献血知识。方法在干预前开展一次基线调查,然后对研究对象开展干预(发放传单、宣传折页、讲座)活动,经过1年的时间的健康教育后,对研究对象再进行调查,并对2次调查结果进行统计学分析。结果适量献血对健康是否有害知晓率问题,公务员干预前后经统计学检验,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.36,P>0.05),学生干预前后差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.49,P<0.01);对于适量献血的数量知晓率问题,公务员干预前后经统计学检验,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.58,P>0.05),学生干预前后经比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.60,P<0.05)。结论无偿献血需要持之以恒的宣传,同时要针对不同的人群,采用不同的宣传形式和多元化载体,做到全面、持续、新颖。
Objective To investigate the effect of interventions on the awareness of unpaid blood donations before and after intervention so as to better popularize the knowledge of unpaid blood donation. Methods A baseline survey was conducted before the intervention. Then intervention (dissemination of leaflets, leaflets and lectures) was conducted on the subjects. After one year’s health education, the subjects were investigated again and the results of two surveys Statistical analysis. Results The appropriate amount of blood donation was not harmful to health, and there was no significant difference between before and after civil servant intervention (χ2 = 0.36, P> 0.05). The difference was statistically significant before and after the intervention (χ2 = 8.49, P <0.01) (Χ2 = 0.58, P> 0.05). Before and after the intervention, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.60, P> 0.05). There was no significant difference between before and after civil servant intervention (χ2 = P <0.05). Conclusion Undertaking blood donation requires constant publicity, and at the same time, we must adopt different forms of propaganda and diversified carriers for different groups of people and make them comprehensive, continuous and innovative.