泉州市法院系统自2015年1月开始推行“跨域·连锁·直通”式便民服务举措,为当事人立案、就近打官司提供便利。该举措与最高人民法院于2015年4月出台的“立案登记制”精神相契合。在肯定其便民利民的同时,也出现了“是否违反法院诉讼管辖基本原则”、“是否不利于提升司法审判效率”的质疑。为此,有必要对其正当性、合理性进行探讨,提出合理化建议,以期使其成为一项真正可复制、可推广的司法创新。 Since January 2015, the court system in Quanzhou has been implementing “convenient services for cross-border, chain and direct” conveniences for the parties to file cases and litigate near litigants. This move is in line with the Supreme People’s Court’s April 2015 enactment of a “filing system”. While affirming its convenience for the people as well as for the people, it also appeared that “whether it violates the basic principle of the jurisdiction of court proceedings” or not “is not conducive to raising the efficiency of judicial trials”? Therefore, it is necessary to discuss its legitimacy and rationality and put forward reasonable suggestions so as to make it a genuinely reproducible and promoteable judicial innovation.