论文部分内容阅读
目的了解日照市饮食行业食具的卫生状况。方法对市区内酒家、饭店、餐厅、大排档、个体摊档和乡镇级酒家、饭店(档)进行食具卫生监测。结果 2009～2011年3年来市区和乡镇共采样监测的食具11066份,合格7567份,平均合格率为68.38%。乡镇级饮食行业食具采样检测3019份,合格1699份,合格率为56.28%,市区采样检测8047份,合格5868份,合格率72.92%,乡镇级饮食行业食具消毒合格率明显低于市区。不同类型饮食行业食具卫生合格率相比较,个体摊档共采样检测612份,合格289份,合格率为47.22%,酒家采样5810份,合格4607份,合格率79.29%,饭店、餐厅大排档采样4644份,合格2671份,合格率为57.52%,结论酒家、小吃店、快餐店的餐具消毒效果明显不同,汤匙和筷子对消费者的健康威胁最大。乡镇级饮食行业食具消毒合格率明显低于市区。
Objective To understand the health status of food utensils in Rizhao City. Methods Food and hygiene monitoring was conducted for restaurants, restaurants, food stalls, individual stalls, township restaurants and restaurants (stalls) in urban areas. Results In the three years from 2009 to 2011, a total of 11,066 utensils were collected and monitored in the urban areas and townships, 7567 were passed, with an average passing rate of 68.38%. Township-level food industry sampling 3019 pieces of utensils, 1699 were qualified, the pass rate was 56.28%, urban sampling test 8047, qualified 5868 copies, the pass rate of 72.92%, township-level food industry tableware disinfection pass rate was significantly lower than the city Area. Different types of food hygiene food utensils pass rate comparison, the individual stalls were sampled and tested 612, 289 qualified, the pass rate was 47.22%, 5810 samples of the restaurant, qualified 4607 copies, the passing rate of 79.29%, restaurants, food stalls 4644 samples, qualified 2671 copies, the passing rate of 57.52%, Conclusion restaurants, snack bars, fast food restaurants tableware disinfection significantly different, spoon and chopsticks to consumers the greatest health threat. Township-level eating utensils disinfection qualified rate was significantly lower than urban areas.