学术期刊在知识生产中扮演了重要角色,其把关的标准和过程却一直是整个学术界隐形的规则。通过对于中国新闻传播学6本CSSCI期刊编辑的深度访谈,旨在揭示学术期刊把关论文发表的内部知识。研究发现,首先,期刊的定位和发展受到了所在组织机构的强烈影响,进而会影响到期刊对于论文的选择标准;其次,匿名评审被引入,但现有新闻传播学术生态状况使得传统“三审制”依然起着较大作用;最后,格式体例和文字差错等细节容易成为作者忽视但又是编辑个体在乎的审稿因素,在论文内容的专业评判标准方面,各类期刊编辑有共性之处,但也会基于刊物的定位而有自身的理解。 Academic journals play an important role in the production of knowledge, and the standards and procedures of their checks have always been the invisible rules of the academic community. Through in-depth interviews with 6 editors of CSSCI journals in China Journalism and Communication, the purpose of this study is to reveal the internal knowledge that academic journals keep in mind. The study found that, firstly, the orientation and development of journals are strongly influenced by the organizations in which they are located, which in turn affects the selection criteria of journals; secondly, the anonymous review is introduced, but the existing academic status of journalism and communication makes the traditional " Finally, the details such as the format and the error of the text are easy to be the factors that the author neglects but also the editors who care about the manuscripts. In terms of the professional judging criteria of the content of the essay, the editors of various journals have common But it also has its own understanding based on the positioning of the publication.