唐代帝陵陪葬墓的研究始于宋代游师雄对昭陵的调查,此后经历了金石学阶段、20世纪初日本学者调查研究阶段及新中国考古学调查发掘等三个阶段~([1]),积累了大量的田野考古资料,取得了丰硕的研究成果。但是在陪陵制度,尤其是陪葬墓的分期与分布规律方面分歧很大,且结论多停留在表层的论证上,并没有提供什么有力的证据~([2])。有鉴于此,本文力图在全面分析考古资料的基础上,结合文献,对此问题做一新的审视,不足之处,希请指正。 The study on the tombs of the imperial tombs in the Tang Dynasty started from the investigation by You Shi-xiong of Zhaoling in the Song Dynasty and has since gone through three stages of the epigraphy, the investigation and study of Japanese scholars in the early 20th century and the excavation of new Chinese archeology. [1] , Accumulated a large number of field archeological data, and achieved fruitful research results. However, there are many divergences in the paternity system, especially the staging and distribution of the funeral tomb. And the conclusions are mostly on the surface of the argument, did not provide any strong evidence ~ ([2]). In view of this, this article tries hard to make a new review and deficiencies on the basis of comprehensive analysis of archaeological data, combined with the literature, hope you correct me.