论文部分内容阅读
政府采购作为重要的政策工具,承载着“提高政府采购资金的使用效益,维护国家利益和社会公共利益,保护政府采购当事人的合法权益,以及促进廉政建设”等多重政策目标,追求公平、公正的采购结果是其题中应有之义。笔者以为,我国设计第三方专家评审制度的初衷应出自两方面原因:一是利用专家的专业知识体系对采购标的质量和采购需求的符合性进行把关;二是通过第三方专家客观独立的公正裁定,确保评审结果公平公正。弊端重重目前实行的完全由第三方专家决定采购结果的制度存在很多弊端,并未完全达到当初的设计目标,而且时常发生
As an important policy tool, government procurement carries multiple policy objectives such as “improving the efficiency of the use of government procurement funds, safeguarding the interests of the state and the public, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of parties involved in government procurement and promoting the building of an honest government”, and pursues fairness, The fair purchase result is its proper meaning. The author believes that China’s design of third-party expert review system should be from the original intention of two reasons: First, the use of expert knowledge system to purchase the subject of quality and procurement requirements of the compliance check; the second is objective and independent third-party experts ruling , To ensure that the assessment results fair and equitable. Drawbacks There are many drawbacks to the current system of decisions that result solely from third-party experts in purchasing results, and do not fully meet the initial design goals, and often occur